Bar & Bench News Network
Consumer Unity and Trust Society International (CUTS), an NGO headquartered at Jaipur, Rajasthan, has filed a Preliminary Information Report (PIR) with the Competition Commission of India against Facebook, alleging it for violating the Competition Act, 2002.
CUTS believes that Facebook can potentially engage in anti-competitive and unfair business practices in the market for virtual goods purchased in social games through its Facebook Credit terms in India and therefore its activities in this regard need to be investigated by the CCI, as has been mentioned in the letter enclosing the PIR to CCI.
The NGO has urged the Commission to undertake a detailed investigation into the matter, averring that the anti-trust laws in India have not been very stringently practiced, thus providing a leeway to such malpractices.
Speaking to Bar & Bench, Mr. Madhav Krishna Dar, Senior Policy Analyst, CUTS C-CIER (CUTS Centre for Competition, Investment & Economic Regulation), informed us that in case the CCI fails to take suo motu action against Facebook, CUTS International will continue with a detailed investigation into the issue and will also file a further complaint with the Commission to that effect. Mr. Dar also highlighted that the said PIR is in line with the one filed by an NGO named Consumer Watchdog in the USA.
Facebook launched ‘Facebook Credits' in India last month. Under the new contractual arrangements, game developers using the Facebook platform must exclusively utilise ‘Facebook Credits' in the operation of their games, must agree not to charge lower prices to consumers outside of Facebook, and must pay a 30 per cent service fee for all ‘Facebook Credit' purchases, reports The Hindu.
CUTS also indicated that “Facebook Credits is likely to affect the market for virtual goods sold in social games, a market that is expected to grow rapidly within the next 5 years, concomitant with the explosive growth of social networking”, The Financial Express reports.
It thus remains to be seen whether the CCI takes a proactive action against the alleged party, or CUTS International will have to continue with its investigation.
PIR Filed by CUTS Against Facebook
|
 |
- 1. "Great job at getting the report also out!". Sarthi, Spire Capital
- 2. "An excellent move. But whether CCI will understand the complicacies of internet". George Giri, New Delhi
Related Stories
- Facebook faces legal action
- Competition Commission in action: DTH operators, Kingfisher and banks investigated for 'anti-competition' practices
- International Legal Essay Writing Competition: deadline 10th December
- Call for papers: 1st GNLU International Conference on Trade & Competition Law
- Luthra and Luthra organises 3rd GNLU International Moot Court Competition
- NLIU to hold mediation competition in collaboration with the International Academy of Dispute Resolution
- NLU Jodhpur wins Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition; NLU Jodhpur student also bags Best Oralist prize
Other News
- Re-Upped Round up May 21
- Clasis Law moves to a larger office space in Delhi
- Re-Upped Round up May 18
- SC to hear petition challenging appointment of sitting AP High Court judge; Petition alleges deliberate concealment of pending criminal investigation at the time of enrollment
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (4)
Webmasters: AIKYA