Foreign Law Firm Case adjourned to September 22 for final hearing and disposal; BCI files its Counter Affidavit

Bar & Bench News Network

Aug 02, 2011

A Bench of Chief Justice M. Yusuf Eqbal and Justice T.S. Sivagnanam heard the foreign law firms’ case today at the Madras High Court and has adjourned the case to September 22 for final hearing and disposal of the matter.

 

Additional Solicitor General, M. Ravindran appearing for the Central Government requested the Bench to grant some more time to file their response as the Law minister has changed. The Government counsel also requested that they need time to consult with the Bar Council of India to finalise their response.

 

In the meanwhile, the Bar Council of India today filed their Counter Affidavit.

 

Speaking to Bar & Bench, Senthil Ramamoorthy Partner at Dua Associates representing some of the foreign law firms said, “BCI today filed its response and has taken a stand that the Advocates Act deals with both litigation and non litigation matters and this position has already been upheld by the Bombay High Court in the Lawyers Collective case”.

 

Bar & Bench spoke to Petitioner A.K. Balaji, “The matter has been adjourned one last time on the request of the Standing Counsel of Union of India to file their reply. The matter is now listed on September 22 for final hearing and disposal. BCI has filed its counter affidavit which is in our favour”.

 

Speaking to Karthikeyan, the counsel for the petitioner Association, “The Bar Council of India has today filed its response and I think they are with us. BCI has decided not to allow foreign law firms or foreign lawyers to practice in India and they are firm on their view”, he said.

 

The matter is now Listed for final hearing on September 22, 2011.

 

The foreign law firm’s case was filed by Petitioner A.K. Balaji and was last heard on January 24, 2011. The 31 foreign law firm’s case was adjourned twice last year after being heard on August 19, 2010. It was listed for hearing on October 5, 2010 and November 24, 2010. This year it has been listed four times already on January 24, March 8, April 19 and August 2.

 

 

 

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(0)




Be the first to post a comment 

Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (2)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.