Bar&Bench News Network
Indian-American lawyer Sandeep Baweja has agreed to plead guilty on fraud charges relating to a scheme whereby he funneled more than $2 million awarded to his clients in a class action suit, and lost the money on the stock markets.
Sandeep Baweja now faces possible criminal charges carrying a statutory maximum penalty of 30 years in federal prison, as well as action by the State Bar of California. To cover his losses, he has said that he was able to raise $500,000, mostly from friends and family, to pay off some plaintiffs, but that he still owes about $2 million and has run out of money.
Baweja had filed a class action suit on behalf of current and former real estate agents of ZipRealty, Inc. in May 2007. In 2007, Baweja reached a settlement with ZipRealty in which the company agreed to pay $3.55 million as compensation, and to pay the attorney's fees and other costs. Baweja was the sole proprietor of Baweja Law Group, which was based in Los Angeles until August 2008, when he relocated to Irvine. Baweja's share of the attorney's fees was $660,000. The balance of $2,525,000 was to be paid to approximately 800 class member claimants on a pro rata basis. After the settlement money was deposited into a bank account that Baweja controlled on behalf of the class, Baweja set up his own online stock brokerage account and began transferring most of the settlement proceeds into that trading account.
Baweja is represented by Jeffrey Rutherford of Crowell & Moring. Luan Tran of Lee Tran & Liang filed the negligence and fraud lawsuit against Baweja. Luan, who is now representing some of the 800 class member claimants in the current action, was also Baweja's co-counsel in the class action suit against Zip Realty. The Court papers indicate that Baweja lost almost all of the money betting on high-risk stock investments and is now left with $54,800 of the original sum.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- The myth of the American Lawyer
- Indian-American Neal Katyal poised to become the next US Solicitor General
- Shearman & Sterling and Simpson Thatcher on Aditya Birla – Columbian Chemicals deal: Indian company buys US carbon company for nearly $900 million
- DLA Piper promotes Indian Capital Markets lawyer to partnership
- Indian-origin Lawyer charged with Prostitution in US
- 10 Indian American lawyers make it to NLJ’s ‘Minority 40 Under 40’ list
- The Indian Lockstep
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










