Bar&Bench News Network
A PIL has been filed in the Kerala High Court against German penmaker Mont Blanc, Entrack International Trading, the Indian distributor for Mont Blanc, the Union of India and the Ministry of Consumer Affairs. The suit is being filed by Dijo Kappen, the managing trustee of the Centre for Consumer Education at Kottayam, who is being represented by Santhosh Mathew of Ninan & Mathew Advocates.
The petitioner has asked for an order prohibiting the marketing and sales of Mont Blanc's newly-released commemorative pens, the Mahatma Gandhi Limited Edition-241 and Mahatma Gandhi Limited Edition-3000, on the grounds that they are a degradation of the Mahatma's creed of simplicity, and a derogation of national honour. It is contended that the sales and marketing of the product are in violation of Section 3 of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act. The Kerala High Court Division Bench, presided by Chief Justice S.R.Bannurmath and A.K Basheer, has admitted the petition and issued notice to the respondents.
Mont Blanc released the luxury limited edition pen on September 29. The Mahatma Gandhi-241 retails at Rs. 11.39 lakhs ($23,854), and commemorates the 241-kilometre Dandi salt march, while the Mahatma Gandhi Limited Edition-3000 retails at Rs. 1.47 lakhs ($3000). The release of the pen has met with widespread disapproval across the country, and protests that the Mahatma, who symbolizes simplicity and egalitarianism, would be appalled at the usage of his name to promote an elite luxury pen.
Mont Blanc has stated that they have taken the requisite permission to use the Gandhiji's name, image and signature on their pens. As a sop to their detractors, they have also pointed out that the company has donated about Rs. 72 lakhs ($150,000), to the Mahatma Gandhi Foundation, run by Mahatma Gandhi's great-grandson, Tushar Gandhi.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Kerala HC stays sale of Mont Blanc’s Mahatma Gandhi pens
- Mont Blanc's Mahatma Gandhi pen dispute reaches Supreme Court after Advocates file PIL
- NLSIU grad pens his second book – ‘Show me a hero’
- Mota Seth – The Senior Partner: Lawyer M. Rishi Kumar pens his first novel on legal fiction
- 25 Years after Indira Gandhi: The lawyers in the Indira Gandhi Murder Trial and the 1984 Riots
- National Litigation Policy – Pendency of cases to meltdown, from 15 to 3 years
- Trademark Registry to recruit 40 Joint Registrars through the contract route to beat the backlog: 1 lakh trademark cases pending
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










