Bar&Bench News Network
Vaish Associates has signed a 'Best Friends' agreement with Singapore-based Dacheng Central Chambers (DCC). DCC, a joint venture between China-based Dacheng and Singapore-based Central Chambers, is currently operating out of the latter's Singapore office.
Central Chambers' alliance with China's biggest law firm commenced earlier this year specifically to retain clients venturing into the Indian and Asian markets. DCC is managed by Central Chambers' founding Director, Aloysius Wee (pictured), who heads their China and Regional Practice Group.
"In the next 10 years, the Chinese and Indian economies will be at their best, and we want to make sure that we are present to tap it. Vaish has a strong corporate and tax advisory practice and those are the areas that we focus on", Wee told Bar & Bench. He firmly believes that India's political situation vis-à-vis China has little or nothing to do with the economic co-operation between the two countries.
Confirming that the agreement was non-exclusive, Vinay Vaish, Founding Partner, Vaish Associates said, "The essence of the agreement is that when DCC's clients come to India, we are their first point of contact and when our clients are to go to China, they will be the first point of contact." He added, "We see immense potential in China and they, in India. We had been speaking since the beginning of this year, and we struck a good rapport with them. We are positive that our agreement will be mutually beneficial."
With this alliance, Vaish has successfully managed to break the traditional 'Best Friends' mould. Most 'Best Friends' arrangements till date are mostly US and UK law firms. AZB & Partners are allied with Clifford Chance, Trilegal with Allen & Overy, Talwar, Thakore & Associates with Linklaters, ALMT Legal with Clyde & Co., P&A Law Offices with Jones Day and Platinum Partners with Freshfields. Poovayya & Co., had an agreement with US firm Brown Rudnik that was later terminated. This is the first instance of an Indian firm allying itself with a Singapore-based firm.
The only other firm that has broken the traditional US/UK mould is Bangalore-based MMB Legal, a J.Sagar breakaway, which has a non-exclusive affiliation with Australian firm, Rotstein Lockwood Reddy.
|
- 1. "Very interesting! A well thought move. It is difficult not to believe that Indian and Chinese law firms will be leading many transactions in Asia. With India and China growing faster than rest of the world- this could be the way to go for many other mid-tier firms. Cross-border junkies- any thoughts?". Manoj, Delhi
- 2. "Indeed it is an interesting time and this unique cooperation between an Indian & a Chinese firm shall bring new opportunities for both the firms. I believe that the action for the next decade lies among the Asian countries. ". Rishi Anand, China/Singapore
Related Stories
- Vaish Associates promotes 9 key associates to partnership
- Vaish Associates advise Enercon on $198 million twin wind energy projects
- Two former Amarchand Associates start up ‘N & A Law Chambers’
- Vaish continue as advisers to Globus on IPO
- J. Sagar Associates sail on Pipavav IPO
- Dua Associates and battery of Senior Counsels bring TVS Flame to the road
- Corporate Law Chambers opens capital market account with Emmbi Polyarns IPO
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










