Bar & Bench News Network
CLAT Results were finally declared this evening.
Padmini Baruah tops the list with 173 marks for the undergraduate program while Mohit Kant Singh tops the postgraduate program with 140 marks.
Download the Undergraduate rankings for 2011
Download the Postgraduate rankings for 2011
The Convenor of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) issued an explanation clearing out all the confusion and ambiguity of the results. The results released on May 28, 2011 displayed the ranks of the students but did not show their relative performance. It only displayed what was known as ‘master rank’.
The format of CLAT is such that, approximately 20-50 students are tied at the same score. Thus the display of ‘unique rank’ becomes imperative on the result page. Apart from the master rank, the result page of each student on May 28 also displayed (a) their marks out of 200; (b) section-wise break-up of marks; (c) Ranks of students belonging to the categories of Scheduled Caste (SC)/Scheduled Tribe (ST), Women, Persons with Disability (PWD), SC/ST (Women), PWD (Women) and NRI. It also displayed the rank achieved by the candidate in his respective state.
However, on May 30 the unique lists were put up on the CLAT website. This list applied the tie-breaker rule and showed the unique rank achieved by each candidate. In separate columns of the list apart from All India General Category, it again showed the respective category rank of each candidate, that is, rank in All India SC/ST Category, All India Women, All India SC/ST (Women), PWD, PWD (Women) and NRI.
The difference between the category rank list of May 28 and May 30 is that only the All India General ranks were not released on the former date. Since the majority of the test-takers belong to the general category, the results declared on May 28 were of no use.
CLAT has 11 All India Categories
- All India General- 22,622 students had applied under this category.
- All India Scheduled Caste(SC)
- All India Scheduled Tribe (ST)
- All India Persons with Disability (PWD)
- All India Women
- All India Scheduled Caste (Women)
- All India Scheduled Tribe (Women)
- All India Persons with Disability (Women)
- All India Scheduled Caste (Persons with Disability)
- All India Scheduled Tribe (Persons with Disability)
- NRI
Category No. 5 – 11 is only applicable to only few participating NLUs
With regard to the online counseling platform, only a select group of students can access it and the same will be decided on a broad cut-off. The list of these students will be displayed on the CLAT website and only they will be able to access the online counseling platform. Candidates should be informed that the online counseling platform will not deal with the state-wise quotas as the quotas differ in numbers from each university. The online counseling platform will be activated within the next 7-10 days.
Explanation Of CLAT 2011 Results - Updated List Of Unique Ranks
Watch this space for analysis on the CLAT rankings and interview with the toppers.
|
- 1. "where is my name in clat result i got 92 rank". Puneet Bhargava, (Unknown City?)kota Raj.
- 2. "In tryin to be different, NUJS really got a good lesson.NLIU was way better in organising ! and I'm sure Jodhpur will be too. !!". Punit , Jodhpur
- 3. "in result section it showed all india 89 rank bt in final list it is 8737so am i qualifyed for the CLAT!!!!!!!". Roopali Goyal, Delhi
- 4. "in result it showed 101 rank bt finally its 14000 rank am i qualifyng fr clat??????????". Himanshi , (Unknown City?)faridabad
- 5. "management is more confusing than the clat exam paper.........????????? god please help the nlu". Devyani Bhati, ?????????????
- 6. "i hv got 95 as aii india master rank what is my unique rank". Arushi Sharma , Himachal Pradesh
Related Stories
- Delhi Bar Council election results announced
- CLAT Results: Conversation with the Topper, NLSIU favourites, LST continues their top performance
- CLAT 2011 Results: Technical Snags, Futile Scores; Students impatient
- CLAT Results: Conversation with third rank holder Rudrajit Ghosh
- CLAT 2011 Results: NLS still the favourite, GNLU biggest gainer followed by NUJS and NLUJ
- Supreme Court stays Calcutta High Court order; AIBE results to be announced within 72 hours.
- NLU results out, LST students get Top Honours
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










