Bar & Bench News Network
The Bombay High Court has admitted the winding up petition against Wockhardt after almost close to 2 years, after the default by the pharma major in 2009. The petition has been filed by the trustee along with the foreign bondholders after Wockhardt's default on $110,000,000 Zero Coupon Convertible Bonds in May 2009.
The winding up proceedings were driven by the instructing bondholders advised by Juris Corp who in-turn instructed the trustee of the defaulted bonds. The trustee i.e. Bank of New York Corporate Trustee Services Limited was advised by DSK Legal to proceed with the winding up action.
Senior Advocate Janak Dwarkadas is appearing on behalf of the foreign bondholders and the trustee of the defaulted bonds i.e. Bank of New York. Senior Advocate Dwarkadas was assisted by Rahul Narichainia. Juris Corp is advising the foreign bondholders with founding Partner H. Jayesh and Partner Huzefa Nasikwala along with Associates Rozmin Lakhani and Neha Vijayvargiya.
Juris Corp stated, “This provides not just respite to the foreign bondholders, but also to foreign investors, especially unsecured ones. This is actually a positive for corporate India as it should easen their ability to raise mezzanine financing more so in the infrastructure sector”.
DSK Legal is advising the trustee with Partner Raksha Kothari along with Senior Associate Munas Virjee.
Senior Advocate Rohit Kapadia is appearing for Wockhardt and is assisted by Yash Kapadia. Senior Advocate Kapadia is being briefed by Majmudar & Co. Partner Neerav Merchant along with Kashish Bhatia.
Media reports that Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari admitted the winding up petition in the Bombay High Court on March 11, 2011. CNBC talks in detail about the likely impact of this decision on Wockhardt.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Rajinder Narain represent AirCap in Air India winding up petition
- Airlines' woes continue as BPCL files winding up petition against Kingfisher
- Juris Corp, J.Sagar advise on Lodha restructuring; Lodha files for IPO with Wadia Ghandy, Amarchand and Linklaters
- Majmudar and Wockhardt over the first roadblock: JurisCorp helps DBS reach settlement
- Juris Corp on growth mode: 11 Associates, 2 Partner Promotions and Conversation with Founder Partner
- Linklaters, Khaitan and Juris Corp bring broadband funds to Reliance’s Infotel: To raise 2250 crore ECB
- Juris Corp advises DEG and BanyanTree in acquiring a minority stake in Deepak Fasteners
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










