Bar&Bench News Network
It has definitely been a bad month for the Indian judiciary. First there was the fracas over whether the office of the Chief Justice falls within the purview of the Right to Information Act. It was sufficiently embarrassing for the Chief Justice- not only did members of the judiciary openly disagree with him, the Delhi High Court also passed a judgment that the office of the Chief Justice was within the purview of the Act. Then came the allegations of corruption against Justice Dinakaran, recommended for elevation to the Supreme Court.
Now, a 23-year old British student who was molested by a plumber, has claimed that she was humiliated in a Magistrate's Court in Gujarat. Kaya Enrich is on an exchange program and is currently based in Ahmedabad. She was allegedly molested by a plumber, and consequently filed a complaint.
However, that seems to have been the least her problems when she approached the court. She alleges that she was asked irrelevant questions in a language she did not understand. She told media persons, "The experience in the court was humiliating. It was not as physically painful as sexual assault, but I was just as frightened". She alleged in her letter to Chief Justice Radhakrishnan, that the Magistrate questioned her in Gujarati, and did not provide any translation. The matter is being prosecuted by Advocate Meena Jagtap.
After the incident, Kaya sought privacy in the trial, and the matter is now being heard in camera. Also, Meena Jagtap is seeking action to be taken against Sanjay Prajapati, who is appearing for the accused in the matter, for having passed objectionable comments. Reports indicate that the Bar Council of Gujarat have offered their help and assistance to Kaya and also that an enquiry may be conducted regarding the allegations. Chairperson of the Bar Council, Vijay H. Patel, was not available for comment.
|
- 1. "India judiciary sucks! I keep on hearing India shining and its growth stories. These incidents remind me that India is still backward.". Matt, New York
- 2. "Now the Gujarat HC CJ has ordered an inquiry and submit a status report. More details here Link ". Gujarat High Court, Ahmadabad
Related Stories
- Supreme Court adds 5 to strength
- Airlines' woes continue as BPCL files winding up petition against Kingfisher
- McCurry win adds to McDonalds' list of trademark losses
- Law Minister's Vision Statement- larger judiciary, work till midnight, case not to exceed 3 years
- RTI should not infringe on Judiciary's independence, says AG
- A well (w)heeled judiciary
- “State Judiciary in shambles”- CJI; Justice Dinakaran asked to go on leave; Justice Lokur takes over as acting CJ
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










