Bar & Bench News Network
National Law School of India University, Bangalore recently held its second stint at Focus India, highlighting India with the challenges faced and the way forward. The full day conference took place at the law school grounds in Nagarbhavi, on 8th of January.
Focus India kick started with a key address note by Prof. Venkata Rao, the Vice Chancellor of the law school and was followed by a special address by Shardul Shroff, Managing Partner of Amarchand & Mangaldas.
Speaking to Bar & Bench on the conference Shardul Shroff said, “It was a good intensive conference with a lot of high level discussion, but the only thing I was disappointed by was that the students were not up to the level of the discussions. I would recommend better restructuring where the students are brought upto speed, so that they can dialogue with the practitioners. Great efforts put up by the students for organizing this event, it is commendable”.
Speaking about the conference with Manoj Bhargava, Partner Jones Day, he said, “It is a pleasure to be back at the National Law School's Focus India. We're delighted to meet our young talents and participate in the topics proposed by the students. Interacting with young minds and focused experts enables us to think out of the box. Lastly, the students and the school deserve full credit and thanks again for organizing an amazing conference”.
The conference had four sessions in total. The 1st Session: The Companies Bill – One Step Forward, Two Steps Back chaired by Murali Ananthasivan of J. Sagar Associates, created quite a stir. Speaking on agreeing that the Bill is one step forward and two steps backwards, with Somasekhar Sundaresan, Partner at J. Sagar & Associates, said, “To my mind, indeed, the proposed company law represents one step forward and two steps back because of the extent of proposed powers of the state to intervene, the lost opportunity to keep regulatory overlap to the minimum, and the extent to which the Bill would give the government to be prescriptive”.
Speaking on the Bill being a step forward with Vineetha M.G., Partner at AZB & Partners said, “We have a general concept saying that the Director has to perform certain duties etc. In a lot of companies the Independent Directors don’t play the role they are supposed to, and a lot of questions remain unanswered because most of the times the Promoter Directors make the decisions. When the law puts it on the face saying that an Independent Director has an obligation, it is a step forward”.
The other three sessions were on Mergers & Acquisitions, Foreign Investments in India and Capital Markets chaired by Bahram Vakil of AZB & Partners, Shardul Shroff of Amarchand & Mangaldas and Sandip Bhagat of S & R Associates respectively.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- NLSIU makes mooting history: India wins Manfred Lachs for the first time
- Terrific weekend for Luthra & DLA: EIL and Coal India IPOs announced
- India Today Rankings Out – Statistics raise concerns: NALSAR -1, NLSIU – 2, NLIU-Bhopal 3, DU Law Faculty -4, Symbiosis-5, WBNUJS – 6… (UPDATED)
- NLSIU to hold 1st International Arbitration conference in conjunction with arbitration moot; Discussions to focus on legal issues arising out of international investment agreements
- Foreign law firms in India? Not yet
- Swine flu scare in Nalsar, NLSIU
- Mindcrest India dreams big, expansion plans in the works
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










