NLSIU can extend SC/ST reservation only to Karnataka students, says Karnataka HC

Bar&Bench News Network

Sep 14, 2009

The Karnataka High Court has directed the National Law School of India University not to reserve seats for Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (SC/ST) students from other states. This order of the High Court was in response to a petition filed by Lokesh, on behalf of his minor daughter Preeti. The petitioner's daughter had written the Common Law Entrance Test (CLET) and was allotted a seat in the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), Kerala, but was refused admission on the grounds that she was not a Schedule Caste candidate from Kerala. She was then given admission in Gandhinagar National Law University , Gujarat, although her first preference was the National Law School, Bangalore. NLSIU had already allotted its SC/ST quota to 12 students from other states.

The petitioner then filed a petition before the Karnataka High Court praying that his daughter be given admission in NLSIU, and also sought to quash the second provisional list of candidates at NUALS, GNLU and NLSIU. The Court admitted the petition in part, and opined that NLSIU would be bound by the Presidential order of 1950 notifying the SC/STs under Article 341 and 342 of the Constitution. The Court held that SC/ST reservation could not be extended to students migrating from other states and asked the University to admit the petitioner after considering her eligibility.

The petitioner was represented by Senior Advocate Ravivarma Kumar. NLSIU was represented by the offices of Holla & Holla, with whom they have a long-standing relationship.

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(7)
  • 1. "This is scary. Why is it that India is trying to be global and the states are trying to be more local.". Martin, Bangalore
  • 2. "The Petitioner's name is Lolaksha. The policy will be effective only form the next academic year. It is i consonance with Article 341 of the Constitution. What is scary and shocking is that the 'premier' law school of India has overlooked this basic tenet while framing its reservation policy. It is also pertinent to note that the admission of Students already admitted on an all India basis was not disturbed. The students were represented pro bono by an Alumna of NLSIU.". Anonymous, Bangalore
  • 3. "I think its quite ridiculous. That kind of policy of reservation should be applicable only to state/local universities/colleges and not to national universities which are meant to be for the benefit of all citizens of the country, irrespective of the state to which they belong.". Anon, Mumbai
  • 4. "plz register my account plz sir". Jayaram.p, Bellary
  • 5. " in pure family to plz help government kindly request". Guest, (Unknown City?)
  • 6. "IF THIS IS POSSIABLE THEN EVEN DOMICILEIS POSSIABLE". ANU, MYSORE
  • 7. "IF THIS IS POSSIABLE THEN EVEN DOMICILEIS POSSIABLE". ANU, MYSORE
Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (2)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.