SC adjourns AIBE hearing yet again Updated

first they need to get the petitioned transferred, then our expedient Apex Court needs to hear the matter and then may be decide on the AIBE, and all this before the 5th of December. Ha. Oh BCI your hypocrisy amuses me, how do you expect us to believe that you can be entrusted with our future when you can't obviously be entrusted with even the mundane job of serving notices. Its a travesty that none of the BCI members sat for any AIBE themselves, i doubt any of them would have been able to send their application forms in time.Such moral hogwash.

I am sure that there is something fishy in this Mysterious deal between the BCI and Rainmaker company. No proper method has been followed in appointing the company . Moreover the company has no experience in conducting a large scale examination like the AIBE. The BCI is just playing with the future of young Advocates. This is just a Clear breach of the Fundamental rights . Let us hope that the Hon'ble Supreme court takes view of the plight of thousands of advocates whose future remains uncertain. The BCI is just resorting to delaying tactics.

"syop playing with the future of law students"

This is total misreporting. The Registrar does not take notice of any delaying tactics. Your friend Fatehpal has taken you for a ride. Its surprising that Bar and Bench has become another gossip vehicle, rather than sticking to confirmed reports. There is no note in the records and no threat that the Transfer Petitions will be dismissed. How could you even report something like this? The Order of the Registrar is this:ITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 697-702 OF 2010BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSBABUBHAI VAGHELA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay)Date: 25/10/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Dattatrey Vyas, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv. Mr. A.Venayagam Balan ,Adv Mr Fatehpal Sing(in-person). UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Some of the respondents are served and they arepressing to list the matter before the Hon'ble Court statingthat the last date for registration of exam is 30.10.2010. However, this Court has no jurisdiction to order tolist the matter before the Hon'ble Court without confirmationof service and without completing the pleadings, as per rules. In view of such limitation, I have no option but to

AIBE is such an important issue to be decided either by SC or any other HC as directed by SC as the deadline for applications is 31 Oct 2010 and the exam date is also fast approaching, but the way things are shaping up it is evident that this matter is not given due importance. In my opinion " BCI SHOULD INCORPORATE DURING THE 3/5 YEAR LLB COURSE WHAT EVER THEY WANT ACHIEVE BY CONDUCTING AIBE " WHY CONDUCT AIBE WHICH IS AGAINST PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE.

Where is current updates about All India Bar Examinations suddenly what happened to updates to Bar And Bench Site up to 25th of October 2010 updates are available then suddenly stopped to update this site please update the progress of Supreme Court Hearing made on 28th of October, 2010.

Friends,the fact about aibe resolution is much different than that it appears. i think, bci committe is only the puppet but (edited) for passing this resolution. if this is not so, then why the bci is in a hurry to conduct aibe n turning deaf ears to respective bcs and llb students ? and why the authorities are not handling this issue seriously ?

my dear advocate friends,though AIBE Is important for us in nearby future,but advocating rightnow i,e 2009-2010 is null and ultravires,as such before enrolement at states bar councils this has to be informed,while eligible CETs is going to be notified before december every year across the country, why such exam anounced hurry?what is objective? as an scheduled caste advocate iam opposing such move by BCI.

I am sure that there is something fishy in this Mysterious deal between the BCI and Rainmaker company. No proper method has been followed in appointing the company . Moreover the company has no experience in conducting a large scale examination like the AIBE. The BCI is just playing with the future of young Advocates. This is just a Clear breach of the Fundamental rights . Let us hope that the Hon'ble Supreme court takes view of the plight of thousands of advocates whose future remains uncertain. The BCI is just resorting to delaying tactics.".

BCI have not taken the State's Bar Council in confidence and went ahead with the proposal is the violation of the democratic set up....which is causing all the delay..

AIBE examination should be cancelled.We yet not received any study materials.The bar council had taken a unconstitutional step.

Justice delayed justice denied.Judgment delayed students misguided.I actually want to know will the entire process be completed within 30th Oct,2010 or 30th Oct,2011????Leave apart the date of exam!!!!Purely disgusting????

if AIBE exam must for Fresh law graduate then it is must for all Law practitioner because rule is rule.Either firstl all bar council of india memeber clear that exam then we attempt that exam gradually.And law minister virappa moilly also clear AIBE exam show us good example for desire person.

what is the necessity to put an exam? where we have not passed the 5 or 3 years course? it should be put before completing the law course. if there are more becoming the advocates then ban on the course of LL.B. BCI has firstly change the question paper pattern, then also we pass the exam, then again putting the AIBE exam, what is on the mind of BCI i never understood.......i think they don't wanna see new advocates practicing before the courts.SHAILESH DUBEY, Mumbai.

so dear young law graduates what shall we do? simply by writing in this page is enough.These are clear indications of corrupted justice.It is easy for the millionaire to get this certificate that too illegal.Think colleagues,even the fundamental rights of our constitution not protected the upcoming law students which shows the wrong path of our beloved martyrs and not respected by these mortgaged heart people.Such kind of people who are not implementing even the fundamental rights and violating these rights are going to save this country.What is going on here? i.e.in this country.Are we all Indians or we are living in some other country.See friends we all know that what recently happened in Egypt and Now It is the time for us to do the same to save our future as well our country from this corrupted people.Come on dear friends and colleagues to save our country.

It is not expected from the apex court which is for the protection of fundamental rights. One can understand that bar council is only protecting the interests of rain maker and not of the young lawyers. Now sc will hear all original petitioners on 28 and will allow or dismiss transfer petition. Whatever the decision of sc, the matter can not be decided till 8 nov because of vacations.

It really hurts to see that all leading dignitaries are playing with us

this test is not fairly conducted by the BCI.BCI merely playing with the future of the yung advocates.If BCI wants the cream advocates in country,the test is not the solution,all shops [private institution ]who are the liesence holders by the bci to run the institute without sufficiant infastructure should be stoped.the autocretic behevier of BCI must be cheked.i dont understand the thing that why BCI wants to implement this test over the batch of 2009-10 hurrily without giving them infomation in their prospectous of law at the time of they were taking the addmition as alaw student.BCI is putting very hard burdon on the minds of fresh advocats and this act of BCI is very frustreted.i reqested the all law students and who has been passed the law in the acedmic year 2009-2010 that plz rais their voices against the adament descison of BCI to conduct that kind of unfair test.I requested all students of different states to protest against this test.