Bar & Bench News Network
The Law Ministry has prepared a draft note to be presented to the Union cabinet which aims to make the Law Commission (Commission) an independent, autonomous body. The model which is followed in other Commonwealth countries like Britain and Canada aims to separate the Law Ministry from the Law Commission.
The Law Commission in an expert body which was set up to constantly assess the need for new legislations and also to monitor obsolete laws and a need for amendments to the existing laws. The Law Commission of India Bill, 2010 which is currently being mooted will enable the Commission to decide on its annual budget and report.
Currently, the Chairman and the members of the Commission are appointed by the Union cabinet based on the recommendations made by the Law Ministry. If the Bill were to come into force, it is understood that the term of appointment will be extended than the present 3 years. The Hindustan Times has quoted the Law Minister, M. Veerappa Moily stating, “This will help it bring out more reports without compromising on quality as three years is a limited time.”
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice had first made this recommendation in 2008. If the changes were to come into place, the Commission would have a much larger staff and would be on the lines of other statutory bodies like the Airport Authority of India among others which would make it easier for the Commission to come up with a larger number of reports on the legal issues of the country.
The first Commission was established in 1834 under the Charter Act of 1833 under the Chairmanship of Lord Macaulay which recommended codification of the Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code. The Indian Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Evidence Act, the Transfer of Property Act are products of the first four Law Commissions.
|
- 1. "It is high time Law Commission transforms into new Avatar. The role of Law Commission should not be confined to drafting amendments to legislation. However there is a proposal for Judicial Commission in order to overlook the functioning of judiciary, especially the subordinate judiciary. As I have commented earlier, this Commisison should make create an All India Judicial Service as the ICS (Jud) then existed before Independence with judicial officers at subordinate levels and higher levels. Law Commission should comprise of persons of proven integrity and without political affiliation. In fact the reports of each candidate should focus on these two aspects in order to bring out better reports. Also there is a need to document the Judicial Impact Assessment of every legislation in India which will weed out unwanted Acts and sections from the statute book so that the people will conclude on every Act. It should be similar to Environmental Impact Assessment for every project to be implemented in India. ". SRIHARI, CHENNAI
- 2. "The step which is deemed to be taken for making the law commission independent just like our Judiciary ? the question mark is used that just like judiciary the recommendation must not meet only political satisfaction of party in centre. If it is a serious effort then first step should be to get such type of authority work without any political intervention.". Abhishek, Hisar
Related Stories
- Law Ministry proposes time frames for Divorce cases; Law Commission lobbies for amendment in Christian Divorce Law
- Legal Education and Research Bill to override BCI’s powers, Planning Commission reluctant to fund Moily’s plans
- Competition Commission eyes Jet-Kingfisher Alliance, investigates DTH operators
- Mindcrest India dreams big, expansion plans in the works
- Nalsar students turn the tables, grade teachers
- BCI and HRD Ministry in tug-of-war over legal education
- Nitesh's IPO plans on; inducts Darius Udwadia on Board
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










