Bar & Bench News Network
Abhishek Manu Singhvi (pictured), National Spokesperson of the Congress Party and Senior Advocate has found himself in a soup and is presently juggling dual roles. Firstly as a spokesperson for the Congress and secondly, as a Senior Advocate in the Supreme Court.
Singhvi recently attracted controversy by representing lottery tycoon Santiago Martin at the Kerela High Court. Santiago is the owner of Megha Distributors, who promotes the Sikkim and Bhutan lotteries.
The case was sensitive and predominantly involves the Congress, as the party itself had launched a campaign against the promoters of the lotteries outside of the State (Kerela). The Economic Times reports that the Congress party’s campaign was so intense that the LDF Government was forced to make an ordinance last month, making it mandatory for other State lottery promoters to make certain declarations. The ordinance had sought to bring better accountability and more revenue to the State.
Previously Singhvi had attracted flak by giving advice to Dow Chemicals in 2006 (Dow is the company which bought over Union Carbide). That time around too the Congress had been hit by his legal advice as his advising had in turn taken a toll on the Congress, as the elections were in around the corner.
The Congress this time, could be contemplating the removal of Singhvi from his post of a spokesperson. The Indian Express reports that Jayanthi Natarajan said, “That the issue was under the perusal of the High Command and the matter had been dealt seriously”.
Although, Singhvi mentioned that he has not advised Santiago and had appeared on behalf of the Bhutan Government, the Congress party’s and the Left Governments keep hurling stones at him. At the end of the day, it’s a tough battle to decide whether to act in an Advocates capacity or abide to inner-party discipline as a Spokesperson for one of the strongest political parties.
|
- 1. "[edited]". A Lawyer With Ethics, New Delhi
- 2. "If its a toss up between doing what is right and earning money, [Edited] So, watch this space.". Ethical Lawyer, (Unknown City)
- 3. "[edited]". Karan, Delhi
- 4. "[Edited]. ". Ethos Of Ethics, Mumbai
- 5. "[Edited]". Ad-va-Kate, Delhi
- 6. "What's the point of giving comments when it's edited all the time??? Am visiting your website, reading your articles and providing comment out of freedom to comment and then you edit it...tell me what was wrong in the previous comment that you did not publish it?? This is ridiculous and makes me wish not to visit barandbench anymore.". Karan, New Delhi
- 7. "Karan, As a matter of policy at Bar & Bench, we do not publish comments that cannot be verified by us or comments that cast aspersions on the anybody's character. As large part of your comment made allegations, which for us, is impossible to justify. I am happy to discuss this with you offline and justify our reasons for editing your comments. Do write to me at gauri.manga@barandbench.com and I am happy to talk to you about our policy.Thanks so much for visiting the site. I am hopeful of convincing you to keep visiting Bar & Bench after we have had the conversation. ". Editor, Bangalore
- 8. "Subject to your 'unprecedented' editing policies, I hope you will atleast provide an update to this news item with the following information that appeared on the front page in today's The Times of India (Delhi edition) 7 October 2010:Lottery Link Costs Singhvi Cong Post:Annoyed with him for taking up the brief of Kerala’s “lottery mafia”, the Congress leadership on Wednesday benched Abhishek Singhvi as the party’s spokesperson. Asked if he was being laid off for the time being, party general secretary Janardan Dwivedi made it clear it was so. “Certain things are implied,” Dwivedi remarked, stressing that the party had taken a “serious view” of Singhvi taking the brief of the lottery syndicate against whom the Kerala unit had campaigned.". Ad-va-Kate, Delhi
- 9. "This is nothing new. He has been involved in such cases before also. He doesn't care about it at all. He may be from Cantab/HLS but [edited].". JBD, Delhi
- 10. "People deserve good life time and Link">loan or small business loan would make it much better. Just because freedom bases on money. ". HenriettaPerkins34, US
Related Stories
- Luthra beefs up Anti- Piracy & Anti Counterfeiting practice with 6 new recruits: 5 lawyers join from Anand and Anand
- With sights set firmly on the future, Kochhar recruits senior independent counsel to head its South India litigation practice
- With sights set firmly on the future, Kochhar recruits senior independent counsel to head its South India litigation practice
- Juris Corp Partner Huzefa Nasikwala moves out to re-start independent practice
- Section 30 of Advocates Act 1961 to be notified soon: Lawyers will be able to practice in all courts
- Lawyers top the Rajya Sabha MPs rich list with pecuniary interest; Singhvi ahead of Jaitley and Jethmalani
- Foreign Law Firm Case: Judgment announced; Foreign lawyers cannot practice unless enrolled BCI; “Fly in fly out” permissible on foreign law and for arbitration (Download Judgment)
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










