Bar&Bench News Network
As Jet Airways continues to face an impasse with its striking pilots, Vijay Mallya-owned Kingfisher Airlines now prepares for a court battle. Government-owned Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd (BPCL), represented by Udwadia & Udeshi, has sought the winding up of Kingfisher in a petition filed before the Karnataka High Court. BPCL alleges that Kingfisher has been unable to pay jet fuel dues amounting to Rs. 314 crore ($65 million).
An arbitration petition filed by BPCL, represented again by Udwadia & Udeshi, is also pending before the Mumbai High Court to arbitrate the jet fuel dispute. Senior Counsel, N.H. Seervai has been engaged to appear on behalf of BPCL. Kingfisher is being represented by Bachubhai Munim & Co., who are one of the standing counsels for Kingfisher. The Managing Partner, Atul Munim was on the Board of Directors of United Breweries, the parent arm of Kingfisher Airlines. Dilip Udeshi and Amol Bavare, Partners at Udwadia & Udeshi in charge of this litigation, refused to comment since the matter is sub judice. The Karnataka High Court is yet to admit the matter.
Kingfisher Airlines' net loss has been increasing each quarter and the airline reported a net loss of Rs 626 Crore ($130 Million) for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, from Rs. 423 Crores ($88 Million) in the same quarter the previous year. Reports estimate that Kingfisher Airlines owes state run oil marketing companies a sum of Rs. 950 Crores in total.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Rajinder Narain represent AirCap in Air India winding up petition
- Jet files petition in Bombay High Court, NAG files petition in Chennai High Court
- Wadia Ghandy files writ petition for Lalit Modi
- ELP secures yet another order for CCI: SC refuses to stay a probe by the CCI into the alliance between Kingfisher Airlines and Jet Airways
- Vodafone files another petition in the Bombay HC against new move by IT dept
- Juris Corp, DSK Legal and Majmudar on winding up petition of pharma major Wockhardt
- Competition Commission eyes Jet-Kingfisher Alliance, investigates DTH operators
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










