Bar & Bench News Network
The Dinakaran probe panel has got itself a new head after Justice V.S. Sirpurkar recused himself following pressure from the Forum of Judicial Accountability. The 3 member panel will now be headed by Supreme Court judge, Justice Aftab Alam (pictured).
Questions had been raised regarding the neutrality of Justice Sirpurkar after it was pointed out that he had sat on Division Benches with Justice Dinakaran at the Madras High Court. It was also discovered that there was also a social and personal relationship between the two judges.
After Justice Sirpurkar’s recusal, Rajya Sabha Chairman Hamid Ansari has reconstituted the panel. The other members of the panel are Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, J.S. Khehar and Senior Advocate, P.P. Rao.
The reconstitution of the panel notwithstanding, one wonders at the amount of time that the panel is taking to complete its investigation and formulate charges against the tainted judge. The panel which was constituted under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 in May of this year is yet to complete its investigation.
Ever since its inception the panel has been plagued with problems. Questions regarding the neutrality of its members, to changes among the members of the panels, along with doubts regarding the powers of the panel have delayed the investigations time and again.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- After Justice Dinakaran, probe panel in hot water: Forum for Judicial Accountability seeks recusal of Justice Sirpurkar
- Victory for Forum of Judicial Accountability: Justice Sirpurkar recuses himself from Dinakaran probe panel
- Justice Sirpurkar to head Dinakaran impeachment panel
- Dinakaran din; after P.P. Rao, Justice Sirpurkar's turn
- Dinakaran problem continues: probe panel reconstituted
- Ayodhya case update: CJI takes no chances and replaces Justice Kumar with Justice Alam; AIMPLB may move apex court against deferment
- SC allows contempt plea by Salve; Prashant Bhushan faces contempt; calls for impeachment of Justice Dinakaran
Other News
- Linklaters Managing Associate Pranav Sharma to rejoin Amarchand Mangaldas as Partner
- Re-Upped Round up May 17
- Recruitment Tracker: Luthra top recruiter followed by Amarchand and AZB for NALSAR Class of 2012
- Siddharth Wahi joins JSA as Of Counsel; Former Baker Mckenzie SA to focus on Energy Sector
- Re-Upped Round up May 16
- Bombay HC taking proactive steps to fight pendency; Special committee to examine pending civil suits for speedy disposal
- CLAT Booze Bills: NUJS defies providing information under RTI Act
The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?
May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the comments (2)










