Justice Alam replaces Sirpurkar in Dinakaran probe panel

Bar & Bench News Network

Sep 28, 2010

The Dinakaran probe panel has got itself a new head after Justice V.S. Sirpurkar recused himself following pressure from the Forum of Judicial Accountability. The 3 member panel will now be headed by Supreme Court judge, Justice Aftab Alam (pictured).

 

Questions had been raised regarding the neutrality of Justice Sirpurkar after it was pointed out that he had sat on Division Benches with Justice Dinakaran at the Madras High Court. It was also discovered that there was also a social and personal relationship between the two judges.

 

After Justice Sirpurkar’s recusal, Rajya Sabha Chairman Hamid Ansari has reconstituted the panel. The other members of the panel are Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, J.S. Khehar and Senior Advocate, P.P. Rao.

 

The reconstitution of the panel notwithstanding, one wonders at the amount of time that the panel is taking to complete its investigation and formulate charges against the tainted judge. The panel which was constituted under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 in May of this year is yet to complete its investigation.

 

Ever since its inception the panel has been plagued with problems. Questions regarding the neutrality of its members, to changes among the members of the panels, along with doubts regarding the powers of the panel have delayed the investigations time and again.

 

Add to My Clips Print this Story Email this Story

 

Facebook LinkedIn MySpace Digg Del.icio.us twitter

Comments(0)




Be the first to post a comment 

Post Your Comment

Name* :

Location :

Email Id :

Comment * :

Notify me when there is a comment


 

The Viewpoint: Indemnification Provisions - Is the fight on the indemnity clause worth the effort?

bullets

 

May 17, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the twentieth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Senior Associate Nandish Vyas and Associate Pranati Ishwar in this article seek to examine the context in which indemnification rights are relevant for acquisition transactions, and also seek to explore if there are areas where they are potentially not worth the  comments (2)

 

 

Thank you. Comments are subject to moderation.