A list of important cases from the causelists of the Supreme Court of India and the Delhi High Court..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.Asha Ranjan v. State of BiharGovt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of IndiaState of Haryana v. State of Punjab.Delhi High Court.Monsanto Technology LLC and Ors. v. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. and Ors.Sharmila Devi v. Union of India and Ors..SUMMARY OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.1. Asha Ranjan v. State of Bihar.[Item 1A in Court 3 – WP(Crl) 132/2016].Bench: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy JJ..Judgment in the petition filed by wife of slain journalist Rajdeo Ranjan, alleging that no steps have been taken to arrest the murderers of her husband due to their proximity with politician Mohammed Shahabuddin..2. Govt. Of NCT of Delhi v. Union Of India.[Item 101 in court 8 – SLP(C) 26200/2016].Bench: AK Sikri, RK Agrawal JJ..Appeal against the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the tussle between the Delhi government and the Lt. Governor of Delhi. The High Court had held that Delhi continues to be a Union Territory, and that the Lt. Governor of Delhi is not bound to act only on the “aid and advice” of the Delhi Legislative Assembly.. 3. State of Haryana v. State of Punjab.[Item 301 in court 6 – Original Suit 6/1996].Bench: PC Ghose, Amitava Roy JJ..Case relating to the Satluj-Yamuna link canal..Delhi High Court.1. Monsanto Technology LLC and Ors. v. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. and Ors..[CS (Comm) 132/2016; Court No. 22 Item No. 12].Bench: RK Gauba J..BT cotton seed major Mahyco Monsanto Biotech Ltd’s plea against Nuziveedu Seeds for infringing its trademark and selling seeds beyond the period of license..Today in Court: The bench reserved the judgment..2. Sharmila Devi v. Union of India and Ors..[W.P. (Crl) 452/2017; Court No. 7 Item No. 16].Bench: GS Sistani, Vinod Goel JJ..Habeas Corpus petition filed by the wife of the controversial BSF Jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav, who had uploaded the video showing poor quality food being served to BSF soldiers..Today in Court: The bench disposed off the petition after recording that the wife be given full and unrestricted access to her husband.
A list of important cases from the causelists of the Supreme Court of India and the Delhi High Court..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.Asha Ranjan v. State of BiharGovt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of IndiaState of Haryana v. State of Punjab.Delhi High Court.Monsanto Technology LLC and Ors. v. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. and Ors.Sharmila Devi v. Union of India and Ors..SUMMARY OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.1. Asha Ranjan v. State of Bihar.[Item 1A in Court 3 – WP(Crl) 132/2016].Bench: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy JJ..Judgment in the petition filed by wife of slain journalist Rajdeo Ranjan, alleging that no steps have been taken to arrest the murderers of her husband due to their proximity with politician Mohammed Shahabuddin..2. Govt. Of NCT of Delhi v. Union Of India.[Item 101 in court 8 – SLP(C) 26200/2016].Bench: AK Sikri, RK Agrawal JJ..Appeal against the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the tussle between the Delhi government and the Lt. Governor of Delhi. The High Court had held that Delhi continues to be a Union Territory, and that the Lt. Governor of Delhi is not bound to act only on the “aid and advice” of the Delhi Legislative Assembly.. 3. State of Haryana v. State of Punjab.[Item 301 in court 6 – Original Suit 6/1996].Bench: PC Ghose, Amitava Roy JJ..Case relating to the Satluj-Yamuna link canal..Delhi High Court.1. Monsanto Technology LLC and Ors. v. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. and Ors..[CS (Comm) 132/2016; Court No. 22 Item No. 12].Bench: RK Gauba J..BT cotton seed major Mahyco Monsanto Biotech Ltd’s plea against Nuziveedu Seeds for infringing its trademark and selling seeds beyond the period of license..Today in Court: The bench reserved the judgment..2. Sharmila Devi v. Union of India and Ors..[W.P. (Crl) 452/2017; Court No. 7 Item No. 16].Bench: GS Sistani, Vinod Goel JJ..Habeas Corpus petition filed by the wife of the controversial BSF Jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav, who had uploaded the video showing poor quality food being served to BSF soldiers..Today in Court: The bench disposed off the petition after recording that the wife be given full and unrestricted access to her husband.