A summary of cases from the causelist of the Supreme Court of India..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.Centre for PIL v. Union Of India And Ors.Mukesh v. State for NCT of Delhi.SUMMARY OF CASES .Supreme Court of India.1. Center for PIL & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 7 in court 1 – C.A. NO. 10660/2010].Bench: Chief Justice JS Khehar, NV Ramana, DY Chandrachud JJ..The case pertaining to the 2G scam. The court is likely to hear Subramanian Swamy’s plea for charge-sheeting P Chidambaram for his role in granting FIPB approval to the Aircel-Maxis deal..Today in Court: The Bench has asked the respondents to eanter appearance before the Court..Read full story here..3. Mukesh v. State for NCT of Delhi.[Item 301 in court 2 – SLP (CRL) NO. 3119-3120/2014].Bench: Justice Dipak Mishra, Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan JJ..The appeal of those convicted in the Nirbhaya rape. The last hearing saw arguments made by ML Sharma, the lawyer representing the appellants. He is expected to conclude his arguments this week..Today in Court: The Bench has asked the accused to submit a lit of mitigating circumstances which apply to them.
A summary of cases from the causelist of the Supreme Court of India..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.Centre for PIL v. Union Of India And Ors.Mukesh v. State for NCT of Delhi.SUMMARY OF CASES .Supreme Court of India.1. Center for PIL & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 7 in court 1 – C.A. NO. 10660/2010].Bench: Chief Justice JS Khehar, NV Ramana, DY Chandrachud JJ..The case pertaining to the 2G scam. The court is likely to hear Subramanian Swamy’s plea for charge-sheeting P Chidambaram for his role in granting FIPB approval to the Aircel-Maxis deal..Today in Court: The Bench has asked the respondents to eanter appearance before the Court..Read full story here..3. Mukesh v. State for NCT of Delhi.[Item 301 in court 2 – SLP (CRL) NO. 3119-3120/2014].Bench: Justice Dipak Mishra, Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan JJ..The appeal of those convicted in the Nirbhaya rape. The last hearing saw arguments made by ML Sharma, the lawyer representing the appellants. He is expected to conclude his arguments this week..Today in Court: The Bench has asked the accused to submit a lit of mitigating circumstances which apply to them.
